Here she is:
It's funny how much controversy can surround the simple act of taking a photo. On numerous occasions in India, I had a person tell me I was not authorized to take a photo. Or better yet street beggars want there photo to be taken only to tell you afterward that they wanted a fee or more humbling, they simply want to see a (stress on the singular, meant to imply first and only) photo of themselves. I vividly remember one such scene when my host family took me out to a bar. I took a picture of a man having birthday cake smashed into his face (a common, if strange, occurrence in India), only to be told by a member of the man's entourage to either hand over the camera or delete all the pictures because apparently it's illegal to take a picture of a government employee. I wonder, does the Indian government fear that someone might actually catch one of their employee's being human and having cake smashed into his face? Or maybe they just airing on the side of safety (because, you know, it never happens. cough, cough) and assuming that their employees are in the wrong most of the time and committing some type of felony. Either way, I think I saw both while I was there:
*****************************************
Two murals were not painted on the actual wall that they were resting on. Instead, the murals had been hung up like a painting.
Even though the mural is registered withthe Office for the Promotion of the Arts, it's still on the same wall as a Bank of America ATM. I wonder, was this just a way to lure in the customers?
No comments:
Post a Comment